Rappler Should Know Better Journalism for Bongbong, Toni Gonzaga – And Farmer Juan
Differently, my personal construct is communication for development (ComDev) – read my “Media Is In The Wrong Media Class Struggle – Media Should Be A Force For Good![1]” (14 July 2021, Communication for Development, Blogspot.com).
So! About the YouTube
interview of Bongbong Marcos by
celebrity host Toni Gonzaga, "The
Greatest Lesson BongBong Marcos Learned From His Father[2]," ANN writes (Author Not Named, 17 September 2021, Rappler.com):
In an open letter, the
Ateneo Martial Law Museum slammed Toni for helping spread propaganda and
downplaying the atrocities during the Marcos dictatorship. The group also
invited Toni to interview Martial Law victims, and offered to facilitate this
if she would agree.
According to its Facebook post, the Ateneo Museum “aims to
be a comprehensive online learning resource that our community of educators can
use to teach the values of human rights, freedom, democracy, and engaged
citizenship to Filipino students.” Unfortunately, neither Ateneo Museum nor
Rappler teaches the exercise of Thinking Journalism that my ComDev necessitates.
Above, the logo-image of Rappler with CEO Maria Ressa says, “Journalism is not a
crime.” What the Ateneo Museum and Rappler are observing is the same; I will
call it here Contrarian Journalism
– when you don’t like someone’s journalism, you denounce it and demand what you
want done instead. Isn’t that a crime against humanity?!
In contrast, Toni’s friend Bianca
Gonzalez has the attitude of a good journalist (good Christian); she
says:
As a friend, I choose
to reach out privately and dialogue respectfully, instead of “call out”
publicly. Because for me, that is what a true friend would do. Even family and
friends can have different views. My friends know that my stand has always been
#MarcosNotAHero, and I will continue to be vocal and share my stand.
“Reach
out publicly and dialogue respectfully” – that is one thing the Ateneo Museum
should have done!
ANN says:
Toni's interview with Bongbong
… has drawn criticism, especially from Martial Law victims and their families.
The Martial Law years under the rule of Bongbong's father is considered as the
dark chapter in Philippine history, marked by atrocities and abuses.
If one YouTube interview with Bongbong can draw such negativity
from the Ateneo Museum and Rappler: It may be that we use our journalism to spread bigotry. We may
even betray much hate. So, our journalism not only ruffles feathers but
ruptures hearts.
What
about the 5 million Farmer Juans; what kind of journalism do they deserve from
Rappler & the rest of Philippine media?
I already told you: ComDev. That considering all the approaches to development journalism enumerated by Yvonne T Chua in her article “Development Journalism[3]” (Oxford Research Encyclopedias):
The approaches range
from development journalists as willing partners of government (statist) to
watchdogs (investigative), and from interventionist (participatory or
emancipatory) to guardians of transparency.
For
Farmer Juan, for continuing and sustainable development not only of his family
but of his entire village, my journalism has been and will be always statist, never investigative, always guardian, and always & ever interventionist!@517
[1]https://communicationfordevelopmentphcomdev.blogspot.com/2021/07/media-is-in-wrong-media-class-struggle.html
[2]https://www.rappler.com/entertainment/celebrities/bianca-gonzalez-response-toni-gonzaga-bongbong-marcos-interview?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR1oYwYXqyiQVpzG3WTBb4u3y4BVDngY6GAD2OuoSAzF5tLLsXlPwxdLE3c#Echobox=1631939374
[3]https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-799
Comments
Post a Comment